Comments:5 dead in Chicago-area store shooting

Barrack doesn`t dare to so much as raise a finger or say a word against current "gun laws".193.170.53.9 08:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

propriety and factualness
This article in its previous state was not up-to-the-minute in its apprisal of events and current information. The article from the Guardian is timely and has as much veracity as anything else the local police are releasing. We have every reason to believe the factualness of what the Guardian has seen fit to print, and it ought to stay in this article until new information either obviates it or debunks it. Please do not continue deleting or reverting, because the rationale in doing so is not concordant with either the facts or Wiki's standards. --Thanks, --WikiPaull —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.59.74.194 (talk) 05:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

shooting
hi there all kinds are murdered up there shooting at the people  is not helping very crazy

After 5+ years there is silence - no news is not good news!
The bodies are buried, the store has been razed but the perpetrator continues to live free. Something is wrong. Significantly wrong! I realize 30-, 60-minute crime programs are fantasy. But, year after year has gone by. Families of the victims deserve crime investigators that can/will solve such heinous acts. Citizens deserve to have crime investigators that apprehend such criminals. We all deserve a system where criminals are caught and convicted through a justice system that punishes such social misfits by removing them from society and when possible: removing them from among the living. --2602:306:3017:5259:44D6:10AD:379F:3115 (talk) 04:36, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Inside job
The only survivor was a part time employee..she knows the shooter. crimes like this typically have inside help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 2601:246:8000:df30:e002:177b:ab11:3ad (talk • contribs) 11:21, 17 September 2020 (UTC)