Comments:Bosnian war criminal sent to UK

How the hell you can give a man convicted of Genocide only 27-years!--75.74.61.245 (talk) 06:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The saddest thing is, he will serve less than even 27 years. -Laolaolao (talk) 12:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * How can someone convicted of genocide be cleared of murder? That's what I really don't get. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 06:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Wrong Map
The map you have posted with the news article is wrong. The country marked is Serbia and the text above is dealing with Bosnia n Herzegovina.

Propoganda???
Factual mistakes: In the righthand margin is highlighted the country of Serbia, not Bosnia i Herzegovina (or Republika Srpska). Second, the flag is that of the Repulic of Serbia, not Bosnia and Herzegovina (or Republika Srpska).

He is described as having played a large role in ethinically cleansing non-Serbs from various parts of BiH yet has there been substantive evidence presented that systematic genocide was ordered? The Hague is a political weapon for those not submissive to the New World Order, not a court of justice. Out of curiousity who are the ones responsible for ethnically cleansing Bosnian Serbs from thier centuries-old homes and corralling them into Republika Srpska? Izetbegovic, Clinton, Albright, muhajadeens, Oric, Council of Foreign Relations, Allah??? By the logic of earlier comments, this could never have happened since no Bosnian Muslims were tried and convicted of charges of genocide against Bosnian Serbs in the court of public opinion or at the Supposed International Court of Justice in The Hague.