Comments:British troops may have received contaminated blood from American donors

Didn't something similar to this happen when America was discovered? Pox-ridden blankets or something? America's trying to take over the UK, everyone!!!!!! :-) 87.194.44.145 10:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Should not the heading be more possitive. It seems that if the blood transfusions were not done there would have been 18 dead Bristish soldiers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.208.22.25 (talk) 18:23, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Apparently this isn't the first time this has happened, although last time was a while ago. And no, it shouldn't be more "possitive" (sic) because the blood transfusions *were* done and if they *were* also HIV positive then those living British soldiers won't have much of a life to live now, would they?  Positive spin because they *don't* have any diseases, I agree with...positive because they would have died otherwise, nope! 87.194.44.145 22:11, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

True, True....... PurplePerson 00:50, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

british troops may have received contaminated blood,,,,,,,,,,
this was the only way to save their lives.rest of the things can be sorted out, as they r doing it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.145.58 (talk) 16:13, 18 January 2008 (UTC)