Comments:Charles Manson releases album under free license

Why did he use the 2.0 licenses not 3.0 --Anonymous101 (talk &middot; contribs) (Note I have no link with the organization anonymous) 20:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Cool. I always did like Manson, for some reason. Stormchaser - (talk) 21:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I don't like the man himself, but I like to use him to argue against parent groups who advocate banning various [video games|movies|TV shows|music] every time there's a school shooting or something - "You're right! Counter-Strike turned that kid into a killer, so we should ban it! And then we can ban the White Album!" A bit of a straw man maybe, but I like it. Chris Mann (Say hi!|Stalk me!) 03:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Headline text
LINDSAY LOHAN WILL MAKE THE MOVIE "MANSON GIRLS"  A BAD MOVIE. I THINK THAT THEY SHOULD PICK OTHER CHARACTERS NOT SOME STUPID GIRLS THAT DON'T KNOW HOW TO ACT.IF THEY ARE GOING TO MAKE THE MOVIE THEY BETTER PUT ALOT OF EFFORT INTO BECAUSE THAT WILL PISS PEOPLE OFF.

It is NOT under free, Creative Commons license. How do I know? I mastered the album. My name is on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.166.237.114 (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)