Comments:Church of Scientology denied injunction against Anonymous

The quote of what the judge said
The quote of what the judge said has grammatical errrors -- I wonder if it is correct? 161.184.42.167 23:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I was thinking the same thing. Wikidsoup - (talk) 00:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * this is the source, I typed it myself so most likely errors. Bjweeks - (talk) 01:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Still, This is great news for anonymous. I am glad that the legal system is finally recognizing that CoS is ridiculous with its lawsuits. Now if the FBI would just get off my back. Rekov - (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

WIN
OF EPIC PROPORTIONS —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.196.220 (talk) 01:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. 24.61.102.23 19:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikinews staff and Anonymous
This is running over/above the story "Jimmy Wales accused of editing for donations" on the front page... I think this sums up what wikinews and wikimedia stand for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.57.96.1 (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Anonymous
Altough I support Anonymous, I find this story to be quite one-sided, bordering on biased. A news organisation should not allow itself to be pulled to one particular side of an argument.
 * It's only one sided because CoS refused to comment. --Anonymous101 (talk &middot; contribs) 17:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

I've said this before

 * I've said this before: Anonymous is the Internet. Hence, Wikinews is written by Anonymous. No-one else gives two shits about this 'war'. It's amazing how many articles there are on the subject on this website. A bogus 'interview with Anonymous' is pretty standard fare for the selectively-reporting, biased Wikinews team. --89.243.182.182 01:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm on the internet. I am not a member of Anonymous, nor do I agree with their commonly violent methods.  I believe that the CoS is a cult, Anonymous is now in the right in taking it down.  Wikinews is not Anonymous, nor is it Legion.  Wikinews is on the internet, and Anonymous comprises a large portion of the internet, but Wikinews is still not anonymous.  And I highly doubt that that interview was bogus.  Project Chanology's Wiki has a press release page, and it wouldn't be hard to get an interview with a member of Anonymous, seeing as they're pretty much everywhere. 64.195.82.235 03:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "We are Anonymous. We do not fo..."
We are Anonymous. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us. &mdash;216.66.59.69 (talk) 17:17, 19 March 2011 (UTC)