Comments:EV for the masses: Tesla unveils mainstream-market electric sedan

As much as I personally like Tesla Motors, this ad, I mean news article, is way way biased.
 * Can you be just a teensy bit more specific? Then someone might be able to do something about it. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Um, have you read the article? "And its design descended from the Lotus Elise resulted in a car you wanted to be seen in."  Seriously?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.82.245.227 (talk) 12:55, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

yes it is nothing but an ad. formulations like "But Tesla isn't just any sports car maker" or "Bursting onto the scene in 2006 with a sexy prototype" are not typical for news articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.202.163.230 (talk) 14:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Non-NPOV phrases used for advertising purposes in the article:

"But Tesla isn't just any sports car maker" "their new Model-S is an improvement in every way" "Bursting onto the scene" "sexy prototype" "different from the conservative four-door sedan prototypes big-name automakers had offered in the past" "impressive accelleration, good range, and stunning efficiency" "a car you wanted to be seen in" "Fast-forward three years" "A four-door machine with aggressive looks"

I'm not going to go unilaterally deleteing this lot, but let's be honest, it's just some marketing exec taking advantage of the wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.254.17 (talk) 15:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)