Comments:Largest mass extinction in 65 million years underway, scientists say

That chart of the global temperatures shown in the article was disproved, not global warming, but just the accuracy of the chart.

poor animals =(
i feel sorry for these poor animals... its not even their fault... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.64.167 (talk) 06:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "50 species died out yesterday...."
50 species died out yesterday...go on...name one of them. &mdash;122.24.153.27 (talk) 05:00, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "wikipedia is the best all the ..."
wikipedia is the best all the info i found was reliable and easily understandable. Keep it up wikipedia for being the best there is!!!!!!!!!! &mdash;190.213.122.226 (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * You appear to be on the wrong site. Wikinews is not Wikipedia. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:12, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "i wouldve liked way more large..."
i wouldve liked way more large mass extinction &mdash;70.70.213.213 (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "scaremongering"
scaremongering &mdash;178.167.214.87 (talk) 22:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "VERY USEFUL THANKS"
VERY USEFUL THANKS &mdash;186.114.57.18 (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "the numbers on the amount of s..."
the numbers on the amount of species are outdated. Recent studies show that there could is more then 50 million species on our planet and we only know of about 10 million. I read this in a NY Times article that i cant seem to find but it is a reliable source. this is no more than a consipiracy and even if it was true it would be wrong for us to prevent unless it meant the end of life on earth. &mdash;71.125.238.192 (talk) 22:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC)