Comments:Libel case against Wikimedia Foundation dismissed

Wikimedia's attorney is Mike Godwin? Does....ugh, I'm sorry.....does he follow Godwin's Law? Fephisto (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I can just imagine it in court "And the defendant, hereby, is declared no-" "Shut the `@%* up, you fascist Nazi!" "Mr. Godwin, excuse me?" 24.56.51.114 15:37, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Mike is the original author of Godwin's law. From what I've heard about it, it was an exercise in memetics; obviously, a very successful one since so many people online have heard of it. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:17, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Nice
It appears pretty detailed, and explanatory. Side note, I'm glad it worked out. Trying to suppress legitimate negative press of yourself is a reprehensible thing... 68.39.174.238 21:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * However this also makes impossible to control/dissuade a third party that publishes defamatory allegations on the wikipedia pages. A sad moment when people are not considered liable anymore for what they say...
 * Bullshit. I suggest you actually read the article. The WMF is not a legally viable target. The author is. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 18:41, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "This is a lot of bs. Tell it ..."
This is a lot of bs. Tell it to the parents of the kids who hang themselves in closets every day. Wikipedia is for gutter rats. Judge Perri is one of the dumbest judges in New Jersey. &mdash;173.220.125.58 (talk) 19:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)