Comments:Nineteen activists killed by Israeli commandos aboard aid convoy bound for Gaza

Comments from feedback form - "If nothing else, the article l..."
If nothing else, the article lacks a statement of the source of the "news." It's the repetition of a rumor. &mdash;24.20.140.200 (talk) 03:38, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * This is why in discussion, I have asked and we have moved the page to "Attack on Gaza aid flotilla" and not "Israel attack" and also every instance that says that Israel DID do the attack, has been changed to an accusation, and not a fact. Until we have proof one way or the other. &#9760; Travis "TeamColtra" McCrea  &#9760; - (T)(C) 05:51, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Umm, rumour? CNN, ABC, The Guardian... IDF has put our press release expressing their view, acknowledging it. I think it's fair rnugh to say it's 'a fact' that it was an 'Israeli attack'


 * Agreed. http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2010/may/31/henning-mankell-israel-flotilla-gaza - This source even states that one of the people on board one of the aid ships mentioned that Israelis were boarding one of the other ships in the flotilla and heard gunfire. Torinir (talk) 14:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)


 * "Attack on Gaza aid flotilla" much better. The news sources wobbles from 10 to 19 to 9 and so forth. rursus (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "this article must be showed on..."
this article must be showed on the main page. &mdash;Aozm (talk) 05:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay, it had to go through a review process, it's now lead 1 on the front page Irunongames  •  play  12:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "I found this article to be a f..."
I found this article to be a fair representation of the incident. While I feel the title could be rewritten, there is no disputing the factual content of the article. &mdash;TrickyH (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

if this happened in the US
all the protesters would likely be dead, our police or military do no respond calmly to violent resistance. I think a few individuals on the lead ship cared less about the lives of themselves and their shipmates than they cared about provoking an incident for Israel. Any rational person in the middle of a raid would hit the ground and surrender, to resist is a death wish. Regardless of whether you are justified morally, trying to violently resist a raid is going to get you and many others killed.

I dont see this changing anyone's mind about Israel, if the protesters were completely peaceful it might have. This way it just polarizes both sides because they both see themselves as victims and their actions as justified.--173.85.4.109 (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

So basically your saying that in the US every resistance to law enforcement action is meet with deadly force? That's quite idiotic, following    your reasoning the police at the various g8 protests should start shooting on the protesters Iran-style.

Hey, it didn't happen IN Israel, it happened in international waters...

The UN Security Council stops short of condemning the attack
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/jun/01/un-condemns-israel-assault-gaza-flotilla - Calling for an inquiry into the attack, the UNSC stopped short of condemning the attack, due to objections from the US.