Comments:Noel Cox talks to Wikinews about New Zealand's constitutional monarchy

God Save The Queen! Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 05:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt
The responses to the questions in this interview are a classic example of what marketers call the three point dichotomy of FUD - Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. They are intentionally put to entangle the debate in parameters that substitute emotive arguments for reason, they are more to do with disruption than pro-active arguments for the monarchy.

First we have fear:



This is empty speculation. As is this:



Just as the example of Tonga doesn't instill confidence in monarchy. Nonetheless, Prof Cox' uses the fear line of argument (social tension! Fiji! etc) to make his point. But in doing so, he ignores the precedents within the Commonwealth of transitions that were not plagued with social tension or political instability as he claims.

Then we have uncertainty:

Prof Cox states:



...and yet he also states:



Which invalidates the claim that the monarchy is an 'essential' element of the Treaty. If it is not legally essential, then it is hard to make the case for the monarchy, except for emotive attachment. And this is problematic too - the emotive attachment to the Treaty is just that; it does not follow that Maori - or the New Zealand public in general - loves the monarchy. Indeed, more Maori are opposed to the monarchy than support it (cf NZES 2005).

And finally, doubt:



The 'doubt' aspect is in ensuring that any claims of political allegiance of Governors-General can be denied.

Lewis Holden


 * FUD is also a method used by the RM Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 04:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Care to give any examples Brian? Or is this just your usual one-line attack with no substance? --Lholden 10:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)