Comments:Swedish Parliament passes electronic surveillance law

mod the link

mould the procession

a disjunct chess match where our true opponent is the square

--kopimi (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

1984 IS NOT AN INSTRUCTION MANUAL! Fephisto (talk) 16:13, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

The arguments against the law are omitted
I'd say this article is biased. While the arguments for the law are presented, the ones against it are not.

''The stated intent of the monitoring is to protect against foreign threats, cyber warfare, and the like. The hundreds who rallied to protest the privacy infringement seemed to have their own ideas.''

"...their own ideas" - this article won't be NPOV unless these ideas are explained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.64.76.116 (talk) 09:50, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Be bold, also, this should probably be under the contributions page. Fephisto (talk) 16:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)