Comments:Talk:ElBaradei says no 'concrete evidence' of Iranian nuclear weapons program

Duh! Of course they would hide any concrete evidence! The thing is, that they don't let the inspectors see everything that they should see, therefor they could easily have a weapons program that they aren't seeing. The issue isn't about concrete evidence, it is about how the inspectors aren't allowed to see parts of the process, which means that there probably is a weapons program that they don't get to see. Just because they don't have evidence of it, doesn't mean they aren't making nukes. Lots of fools will interpret this to mean that they aren't making nukes. This still doesn't change the fact that they are not cooperating with them and are hiding things from them. Nothing has changed. Contralya 03:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

yeah i mean sadam wasnt letting people inspect everything and... o shit that argument dont work!!! DUH

there are alot of reasons to develop nuclear power and even nuclear weapons that dont mean war, have you heard of MAD, by having nukes you pretty much guarentee nobody is going to invade your country (this is a good thing with america about) and stop plenty of direct conflicts saving lives, i wonder who was arguming that point about 50-30 years ago, o wait it was the good old hill billy u s of a