Comments:Three injured in Gaza after Israeli airstrikes

This article isn't NPOV at all, Its just a blatantly anti-semitic attempt to Demonize the IDF. Whenever a couple of so-called "civilians" get scratched up by airstrikes that were used to target terrorists. it's suddenly "news", but when Hamas daily slaughters Israelis, it goes unreported. Their shouldn't even be an article about this. It disgusts me how Wikinews has become a haven for low-life anti-semites. 64.222.123.220 (talk) 02:28, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * So, two wrongs don't make a right. No one is saying that hamas is good (actually, we try to avoid making value judgements, and report what happened, letting the reader make up their mind) There are also articles about bad things that hamas does (ex UN demands return of aid seized by Hamas). If you want to expand our coverage of such issues, I welcome you to write articles about the subject. At the end of the day, an israeli airstrike killed some civilians. In all conflicts there are civilian deaths. It is up to the reader to decide if the threat of hamas justified israeli tactics. On one hand, Israel has real threats to its security that it must deal with in some fashion. On the other hand, innocent people who did not do anything are getting killed. You could probably make good arguments for both sides of if israel is justified. Bawolff ☺☻ 02:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)


 * There are no civilians in Gaza, only terrorists = Please back that up. So, even infants and small children with no mind of their own are super-evil terrorists? And it's ok to blow them up, they deserve it? I'm not saying that Hamas is great or anything (and wikinews strives never to make value judgments like that), but that's a totally illogical argument. Tempodivalse [talk]  18:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)