Comments:UK court rules Pringles are potato-light

Comments
I'm not exactly where I stand on this. I mean, on one hand, the tax is an infringement on personal rights... but if the law does stand as it does, how the hell are Pringles NOT a potato snack? What?! w:User:Poe Joe 20:02, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
 * It's because a 'potato snack' (as opposed to food with a little bit of potato in it) has to be by definition, at least 50% potato. Pringles are not; therefore they are not. What I'm interested to know is if the product will fall in price because of this or if they'll simply turn what would have been money for public spending in to extra profit. Shane.Bell (talk) 12:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Or expand. Fephisto (talk) 02:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

i'm more curious to know what the remaining 52% is... - Imind (talk) 16:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * (grabs a can of pringles) If my taste buds are correct.....salt.  Fephisto (talk) 02:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)