Comments:UN report says 80 per cent of world's refugees live in poor countries

The story deserves a philosophic debate, and should mention USA wars as a ratio (say 50% to blame), so who should bear the burden of post-war resettlement etc.?

Could discuss the fact that, a majority of all refugees, these days, are economic opportunists, or they have failed to either fit in with their birth country majority rules, or failed to change their own house order.

Therefore, why should the rich make themselves poorer, and more at risk from undereducated criminal and survival mentality cases, bringing their disease into the richer people's houses. Capitalist countries are the financially richest and they chose not to be as benevolent as Marx/Lenin might wish.

Why should the good producers devote more than a monetary assistance, and monitored migration methods to avoid settlement risk, thus domestic crime aggravation factors of the lower socio/economic, or self degenerated and usually criminally minded of a lower moral upbringing.

The British long ago speculated the situation with the story of Robin Hood, a rich Noble birth chap who robbed the rich and gave to the poor, the solution was never agreed. Certainly I am not starving, but poor surviving abroad, but do agree one can't blame over 75% of the problems on the refugees themselves. Still one can't even blame 10% on the wealthier Industrial world, and certainly we don't force them to adopt Islamic against Christian values and demands. Most of us have a benevolent percentage from our earnings going to help them, and most of us don't believe in retaliation "eye-for-an-eye" punishments as does their fatwa following idea do. Even the UNDP or UNHCR, the instigator of this plea for greater compassion, and they are also paid for by mostly Industrialized & developed wealthier top quartile. That Pakistan choose to take their Afghan and other Musilms in compassionately is not the fault of the World, is it?

Likewise internal poverty in these mostly Capitalist countries must have the compassion metered to the degree of self infliction of the sufferers. Criminal un-employability, drug addiction, excessive dependent births, alcoholic escapism sufferers, lazy workers games mentality, gamblers etc. The diligent hard worker fund accumulator pays tax for a share of all State compassion that UNDP & UNHCR benefit, and they may choose to donate extra from time to time as they deem affordable economic security benevolence balancing permits.

Why should anyone pay the fool to put cash against a wall in the local W/C? --Robbygay (talk) 00:21, 22 June 2011 (UTC)