Comments:US B-2 stealth bomber crashes in Guam

Stupid freakin US..... Why don't they spend that $2 billion on something useful, instead of spending it on new ways to kill others 
 * Maybe because we've been put in the position of defending the global interests of countries unwilling to defend their own ;). Spacehusky - (talk) 14:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Because altruism is the hallmark of U.S. foreign policy. :p -Etafly - (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Of course, but since the end of the Cold War the U.S. has assumed a very disproportionate share of the burden of representing the interests of the west overseas.

1.2 to 2 billion dollars could feed 1.2 to 2 million starving, mal-nourished people around the world for a year. And please, i hope no comments spring up about the US 'needing' B-2 stealth bombers. - kjinnra_nemesis
 * Countries love to criticize American defense spending but when we ask them to commit forces in our place they fall strangely silent ;) Spacehusky - (talk) 04:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't have anything to do with those people criticising American defence spending on the grounds of them thinking that the militaristic approach to getting things done is wrong, would it? Talkingpie - (talk) 18:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Comments from feedback form - "Awsome"
Awsome &mdash;142.163.49.90 (talk) 14:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)