Comments:US Supreme Court allows 'light' cigarettes lawsuits

people are trying to get money for it said enviromental purposes instead of health... wait what? you smoke cigarettes for years on end and you believe that you arent doing much harm to the enviroment because they put the label of light on the cigarettes? how can you justify sueing money that i seriously doubt any of the involved parties would send to enviromentalist groups instead of likely keeping the money in their greedy pockets glad they could sink their teeth into some amount of money. in the article it said someone was smoking these light cigarettes for 15 years. 15 years again 15 years isnt that a long time to be smoking cigarettes to all of a sudden become aware of possible negative affects they might have on the enviroment...?-138.163.160.42


 * It says economical not environmental --199.190.223.190 17:53, 17 December 2008 (UTC)


 * lol--KDP3 (talk) 19:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)