Talk:"Crimea is a 'red line' for Putin": Dr. Jeremy Morris discusses Ukraine war developments with Wikinews

Title
I don't like 'at one-year mark', because Dr Morris actually sent the emails on 27 Feb, and also because this isn't a 'retrospective' à la but rather a standard interview about Borrell's comments. Would something like "Wikinews interviews Dr. Jeremy Morris over Ukraine war developments", or otherwise emphasising the interview centres on new war progress &c. work? JJLiu112 (talk) 23:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)


 * True (to clarify, Borrell's comments are not the focal point of the interview, they're simply mentioned as context-perhaps I should move them out of the first sentence). That sounds like a good title; I never particularly liked this one, that will allow me to incorporate a quote. Heavy Water (talk) 23:22, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I like the new title. Although, insofar as they justify and contextualise the interview itself, Borrell’s comments therefore BECOME the focal point. Not like the war itself isn’t reason enough, obviously, but it would be like how television would present a story or development and then bring on some expert to talk about it. JJLiu112 (talk) 23:56, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * ✅ Heavy Water (talk) 23:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)