Talk:"Sunshine", "Queen" in the spotlight as 79th Annual Academy Award nominations announced

Subtleties
I don't know how politically correct wikinews/pedia tries to be officially, but I couldn't withhold laughter upon looking that the purple image tagged to this article. The image, of course, looks a great deal like female genitalia. Now, I don't know how dire this is; I imagine firstly that it was a conscious construction by the artist of the image, but then again, it isn't explicit. Further, images of pencils and the like could come under scrutiny also if this one was to be contested. Personally, I don't think that it should be.

I just thought it was funny, and then began to wonder how liberal Wikinews/pedia is about this sort of thing.


 * Must be in your imagination, never occured to me that that oscar statue looked like female genitalia.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:05, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think its fine. (you have to have a bit of an imagination to see that, + Content disclaimer) Bawolff ☺☻ 21:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The image looks OK to me. (That is totally your imagination). — F e  llow  Wiki  News   (W)   (sign here!)  22:27, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Image
edit protected Please add missing image because the image was deleted on Commons. I'm not sure why it was felt that this was a good image because it just shows an Oscar statuette shrouded in shadows with a bright pink background. I am happy to temporarily undelete it if anyone wants to have a look, but imho there is a very similar image on Wikipedia that could be uploaded and used instead. Green Giant (talk) 18:00, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Pi zero (talk) 18:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)