Talk:According to recent study, deaths in India number roughly 4 million during COVID-19 pandemic

Review of revision 4628853 [Not ready]

 * Thank you, will try to work on this later today. What would splitting involve? Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 15:22, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Well perhaps, you could refocus to the publication of the study, and then put the other things in the background, ? •–• 15:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi yes that sounds great Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi I've added dates, etc using the study but not sure if I should submit it yet . Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:38, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Events from May are not new to be wn:newsworthy in July. Perhaps the study might be published this week and could focus on that. •–•  16:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it was published today fortunately so added that. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This might need moving to a new title, such as one including "Study:". Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:55, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * after you have refocused the article to speak about the report as the primary thing, can you please make sure the article conforms to wn:SG? •–• 17:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes and cheers. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Reviewing

 * Careful review of BBC source. Making sure OUR article isn't saying some stuff NOT SUPPORTED by sources. That is an important clarification.--Bddpaux (talk) 17:27, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Stuff from Guardian article looks good. --Bddpaux (talk) 17:31, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I read about 60% of the CGD paper (a little heavy, numbers-wise).--Bddpaux (talk) 17:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Reuters stuff cross-references OK.--Bddpaux (talk) 17:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)