Talk:Australia: Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith loses war crimes defamation case against media outlets

Title
Alright guys, I'm unsure about this one. On the one hand, he is an alleged war criminal, insofar as he has been alleged, by media outlets, to be a war criminal. But in all the sources, and even the top sentence here, his top qualifier is as Australia's most-decorated soldier. Considering the weightiness of these allegations I'm not sure whether its inclusion is warranted or breaking NPOV; perhaps better, more neutral title (while still distanced from BBC) would be "Decorated soldier Ben Roberts-Smith loses war crimes defamation case against Australian media outlets"? JJLiu112 (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Fair point. "Decorated Australian soldier Ben Roberts-Smith loses war crime defamation case against media outlets" might work better? Commemorative1 (talk) 05:18, 3 June 2023 (UTC)