Talk:CMHC: several housing markets in Canada 'highly vulnerable'

Article status
Why did you remove this from the queue for six hours and then put it back? Also, why do you keep saying it's boring? Either it's news or it isn't. A reviewer might not get to an article because reviewers, like everyone on these projects, are volunteers; a reviewer might choose to apply their limited review time to another article because they suspect another article will be easier to review; but I think most reviewers are unlikely to shun an article because it's a bit boring (not that it couldn't happen, but I suspect it'd have to be spectacularly boring, and how boring can a short article be?). Btw, just because the article hasn't quite reached the end of its third day after (this has about three and a half hours left) doesn't necessarily mean it's still fresh. A reasonable reviewer could have some reason to draw the line anywhere on the second or third day after. --Pi zero (talk) 20:27, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I was trying to figure out why a reviewer has not attended to this story yet while at least two articles on the main page are currently stale. Ottawahitech (talk) 20:57, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
 * On Wikinews, stale is a term of art for an article that dosn't get published while still fresh. Articles once published do not go stale in this sense.  Our archives are a hugely valuable resource, a collection of over twenty thousand articles going back well over a decade.  A photo album, so to speak, of snapshots in time.  --Pi zero (talk) 21:05, 29 October 2017 (UTC)