Talk:Canadian government settles lawsuit over children 'scooped' out of indigenous communities

This morning, I read about this story, and it as C$800m. Even BBC says so (link). Can you please re-check and clarify about ambiguity? acagastya PING ME! 16:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * As per CBC News, it's 750 million Canadian dollars. It's really common for articles to round up to the nearest "all zeros" number though, which I'd suspect is why a few articles are saying "about 800 million". &mdash; Gopher65talk 23:29, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If it were some other source, I would have agreed. But for BBC, I don't think so. acagastya PING ME! 23:43, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4353506 [Passed]
No picture, but... what do you even add to an article like this for an image? It's a lawsuit/settlement, which lends itself to only the most generic of images. Someone can add something generic if they're so inclined. I don't think an image would improve this article, except maybe by adding a visual distraction. &mdash; Gopher65talk 00:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, as a side note, this is the first article I've felt inclined to review in years! &mdash; Gopher65talk 00:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Also, I know style refers in large part to the Wikinews Style Guide:P. It's a pretty standard style guide though, with only a few wiki-space quirks in it. &mdash; Gopher65talk 00:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * BBC did not use words like "about". The Star said at least 800m. CBC said 800m. The ambiguity needs to be addressed properly. acagastya PING ME! 00:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Several news outlets erroneously grouped together two different announcements by the Canadian government: a settlement that would pay out a maximum of 750 million Canadian dollars if all claims were made, and a separate announcement of the creation of a 50 million dollar foundation. They were announced at the same time because they're both regarding First Nations initiatives. The settlement itself *is* no more than 750 million though. I'm not 100% sure why they made the editorial decision to do that, but they did. &mdash; Gopher65talk 00:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

Where it's mentioned
Just for the record, "Australia." Darkfrog24 (talk) 10:31, 10 October 2017 (UTC)