Talk:Comic Relief funds allegedly invested in arms, alcohol and tobacco firms

Comment
--Pi zero (talk) 17:39, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The lede doesn't address basic question when. This can likely be addressed within the purview of a reviewer, at their discretion.  [Note:  the critical when for newsworthiness is the when of the focus, which here is the Parnorama broadcast.]
 * ✅ —Tom Morris (talk) 19:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Misspelling in headline
"allegeldy" should be "allegedly". 86.160.126.67 (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Pi zero (talk) 16:44, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

This doesn't need to say allegedly!
There are documents proving this, and Comic relief hasn't denied it, so I think 'allegedly' should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iamsorandom (talk • contribs) 17:28, 31 January 2014‎
 * A news article is a snapshot in time. Substantive changes to an article can only be made within 24 hours after we publish it.  After that, if the article contains an error, we can put a correction notice on it; but in this case, as I understand it, what you're describing isn't an error, so doesn't warrant a correction.  --Pi zero (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)