Talk:Congressman Cunningham admits taking bribes

This article is a little too dry, try to explain a little more rather than having many short statements as their own individual sentences (breaks the flow), examples:


 * Details on where the sentencing takes place would be nice to include here.


 * Something like this requires a larger detail rather than just a single sentence.


 * When? How?
 * Also, the individual quotes in the middle of the article are very... just not neccessary. Furthermore, the article could use a reorganization - there is little to no chronological order of presenting items relevent to each other.  --MrMiscellanious (talk) (contribs) 22:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Addressed all the remarks, except "chronological order" part as I don't see how it applies. But feel free to add more background information on the charges and the dealings of Cunningham and put them into a chronological order. It should make for an interesting reading. In general the remarks seem quite petty. Next time just take a look at the sources and fix them yourself. --vonbergm 22:42, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I'd like to, but every time I tend to edit an article - big or small - someone always accuses me of something by not discussing it first. So, which would you rather have?  --MrMiscellanious (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * I guess that's true, so thank you for being considerate and never mind my ranting. :-) I still believe that moving it to develop was not really necessary as your objections/suggestions were quite small fixes. If nobody tends to your questions, then that's a different issue of course. --vonbergm 23:59, 28 November 2005 (UTC)