Talk:Customer says Verizon confuses dollars and cents

Thinking to unpublish?
As usual ;) Rather than unpublishing, please add a comment here as to what to fix, or better yet, just drop a brief note to towsonu2003 at gmail dot com. If you can't help but unpublish it, you need to please add a reason here in the discussion page so we can fix it :) thanks Towsonu2003 18:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Who said we were going to unpublish? It's an interesting story, I'm in favour of keeping it. --  Zanimum 18:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Usually happens with my stories (someone unpublishes it without noting what was wrong in the discussion page) so I put that text to the article I publish ;) Towsonu2003 19:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * a response from verizon pls, at the very least, we can note Verizon's apparent e-mail offer to halve the charges, as detailed on the blog.
 * also, all the info in this article is sourced from one party in a dispute, and shld be attributed to him. i.e. "Verizon charged him $72" shld be "He says Verizon charged him $72" &mdash; Doldrums(talk) 19:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Done. --  Zanimum 19:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Title change
I deleted the word "bill" from the previous title. It was confusing (I had no idea what "Verizon bill" meant, then I figured that out but it isn't only the "bill from Verizon" that confuses cents and dollars, it's also at least 2 reps who think .002 cents = .002 dollars -listen to recording for clarification-). Seems to me it looks better now. Towsonu2003 19:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

editprotected
editprotected CAT:Economy and business
 * I can see why it was originally not put in that cat, but, ✅ --Pi zero (talk) 12:59, 25 October 2016 (UTC)