Talk:Ethics chief: UK PM's reforms after Partygate "highly unsatisfactory", won't "restore public trust"

Review of revision 4679528 [Passed]

 * It's generally accepted, and has been used by international media (https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-conservative-lawmaker-quits-government-over-toxic-partygate-culture-2022-05-27/); (https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/29/uk/uk-partygate-20-penalty-notices-downing-st-intl/index.html). --JJLiu112 (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, it's a term I recognised and have seen used before in media here and internationally, but was just wondering if it would be all that familiar to those who don't follow UK politics. Given it is a generally used term though, as you note, and there's not much of a better alternative ("UK PM's reforms after revelations of breach of lockdown restrictions to attend party" may be just a bit too wordy for my liking), I think using it here's fine. --LivelyRatification (talk) 22:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC)