Talk:Federer wins fifth Wimbledon title

Typo
"Independant" => "Independent" Van der Hoorn (talk) 12:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ -- Sken   my talk 10:22, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Please use the local link for Wimbledon; and tennis
editprotected acagastya 04:50, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Links ✅ infobox didn't exist in 2007 --SVTCobra 07:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you see the later date on the template as an argument against adding? Seems like it could be for.  Plus, this doesn't have a different infobox that one would be removing.  --Pi zero (talk) 12:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Philosophically, I believe we archive and protect articles to preserve them as intact as possible. And, yes, the fact that a particular template didn't exist when the article is a solid argument, imho. But it goes deeper. We don't add photos to articles in the archive, so why infoboxes? They don't aid in navigation because the infobox will only show the most recent articles for the category, not articles from that era.
 * As a practical matter, I am also against the constant tinkering with the archives. What if next year, someone creates Wimbledon? Are we to yet again get another editprotected request to replace tennis? Or maybe someone feels that Roger Federer himself deserves an infobox. --SVTCobra 14:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)