Talk:Four arrested in Birmingham UK in connection with July 21 attempted bombings

Whodunit?
Could it be another frame up? Something like this U.S. government plot? "We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area"

Who is behind the scenes financing and controlling this enemy? Is it people who we'd never suspect;e.g.[]? Who is it that needs to be brought to justice? We know that when it comes to terrorist attacks the official government assignment of blame can not be trusted for truth or accuracy; e.g.

July22,2005 Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair; the "Asian" looking man shot dead by police was "directly linked to the terrorist bombings."

July 23,2005 London Police;"We are now satisfied that he("Asian" looking man) was not connected with the bombing incidents".

So; "Who is behind these vicious attacks? Who is it that needs to be brought to justice?"

This is the question that needs to be asked and re-asked whenever a "terrorist" attack occurrs. Who are the "terrorists" that committed the act? A patriotic citizenry can't just blindly accept the "next day" government assignment of guilt. Without a trial or thorough investigation, any superficial "evidence" lying around or anonymous calls claiming responsibility could just be part of a frame up. Here are a few verified historical examples of how cabals within just one government (USA) have started and inflamed major conflicts by killing civilians and blaming it on someone else; which is why, regarding this attack, we, the readers and citizens, need to withhold our judgement and the direction of our anger until we find out who actually did it.

"Another most painful episode concerns the overthrow of President Ngo Dinh Diem, by a cabal in the State Department led by undersecretary Averell Harriman"[][][][][] Paulrevere2005 12:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Nobody has been 'blamed' yet. The man who was shot dead was Brazilian, not 'Asian' in the context of the original eye-witness account. The thorough investigation is taking place (as in this story and many others) and nobody has drawn any conclusions yet. The police were very quick to say they were wrong and apologise, though that doesn't excuse what happened, obviously. And, on the whole, though there is certainly unprecendented (and very unfair) suspicion there is no widespread violent anger being directed at a community. Hold your judgments too :) ClareWhite 11:48, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


 * There is already a conclusion that "muslim extremists" did this; a conclusion encouraged by the Blair government; "Mr Straw said: "Almost certainly they are evil people who will claim — wrongly — to have done this in the name of Islam."". A conclusion based upon no evidence at all. The problem with the accidental police killing is how quick they were to lie about it afterwards; -July22,2005 Metropolitan Police Commissioner Ian Blair; man shot dead by police was "directly linked to the terrorist bombings."- That shows a willingness to deceive the people. And about the violent anger, what do you expect to see if something kills 50,000 Brits instead of 50?


 * Why not start with the fact that we have been told that Afghan dope is the primary source of al-Queda's funding,90% of London's heroin is coming from Afghanistan today; Afghan opium production is up over 1000% since we invaded; and the Afghan poppy fields,which are right out in the open, are not being sprayed(killed) by U.S. airplanes like the dope fields hidden in the jungles of Columbia are. Those are facts that are known and admitted by everybody...so if anybody wants to help "fight terrorism"..why not just deal with that source of terrorist funding right NOW!. Paulrevere2005 12:14, 27 July 2005 (UTC)