Talk:Grand jury indicts man in assassination plot against U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh

Review of revision 4680359 [Not ready]
For your information, I left comments for the reviewer on my talk page Ottawahitech (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I notice you find the review 'overwhelming', which I can understand. The article has several key and fundamental issues which prevent it from being published at present. They include what I have specified above. For instance, your decision to incorporate Commonwealth (travelled) and American (center) spelling in the same article, and the fact the three sources provided are formatted incorrectly. I therefore recommend you read past articles and the Style Guide for much-needed counsel. Please do so with the understanding they follow a consistent tone, pacing and standard of spelling and grammar which I have not found extant herein. --JJLiu112 (talk) 00:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4680508 [Not ready]

 * For your information, I left comments for the reviewer on my talk page, again. Ottawahitech (talk) 06:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4680713 [Not ready]

 * I've refocused the article as Roske was indicted today. --Ixfd64 (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Also tagging as she is active. --Ixfd64 (talk) 23:49, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Should be able to review this, but one immediate issue I can see is the inclusion of the Fox News source, given its fairly slanted rhetoric and (imo) general unreliability/bias on US politics -- would be best to potentially substitute it out with another given it's now not the main focus of the article. LivelyRatification (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm not a big fan of Fox either. Give me a moment while I try to look for an alternate source. --Ixfd64 (talk) 23:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I've replaced the Fox News source with one from the U.S. Department of Justice. The original source also didn't indicate what the suspect had said to the arresting officers. I also removed a statement that was not mentioned in any of the listed sources. --Ixfd64 (talk) 00:05, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will take a look at this soon. LivelyRatification (talk) 00:07, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Review of revision 4681198 [Passed]

 * This article, as published, suffered from a great deal of overlinking. --SVTCobra 11:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)