Talk:Industry leaders see energy supply as the next hurdle for AI

Questions for reviewers
I know this might be a little odd; interviewing ChatGPT. I'm hoping its interesting and something a bit different than just a normal synthesis article. If it's too odd or otherwise unacceptable, I can delete it. Otherwise, I have the following questions:


 * 1) Is it required to use the -style formatting with interviews?
 * 2) Should I include the links ChatGPT provided in its response?
 * 3) Should I include a caveat about ChatGPTs responses?

Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 18:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Sorry for flagging the conversation but I'm not sure how else to get a reviewers attention to an article that is only in development phase. Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 16:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Factchecking ChatGPT statements
Conventions used: Verified fact = Incorrect statements = ❌ Statements of opinion = 🔵

Notes are added to explain or clarify false statements. I provide a link directly after the checkmark if I found the information on a site not provided by ChatGPT. If ChatGPT provides a source, it does so at the end of the paragraph in parenthesis.

Note: The agreement for new facilities "to demonstrate they are matched by renewable energy generation" refers to Corporate Power Purchase Agreements (CPPA). The Irish government does not require new data centers to incorporate a CPPA, but prefers they do.

Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 15:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Reviewing
This is an interesting conceit and also has interesting layout as well. I'm going to review this as it sits.--Bddpaux (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Review finished. It never ceases to amaze ChatGPT's ability to say so much, while saying so little.--Bddpaux (talk) 14:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * That's predictive text generation for you – if a program is trained with the exclusive goal of predicting the next word, it'll predict the safest option which generally results in nothing being actually said. A.S. Thawley (talk) (calendar) 15:22, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I think this is a conversation better suited on the opinions page. Maybe others will join in as well: Beyond token prediction --Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 16:41, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Headline
In the future, the headline should focus on a specific event just as the article itself should, and should also not try to read people's minds by reporting what they think ("Industry leaders see") rather than what they say and do. In this case, Zuckerberg's comments would've made an excellent focus. Heavy Water (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)