Talk:Israel scrambles fighters to intercept unresponsive aircraft carrying Tony Blair

Title
I don't think I really consider the "shootdown considered" element of the title to be appropriate. An intercept does not immediately mean they were considering to shoot it down. Of the sources listed only ABC seem to suggest a shootdown as close. I think this is an attempt to dramatise the story by ABC that we shouldn't be following. Adambro (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree, ABC's claim seems to be an attempt to make this story more intresting Anonymous101  14:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict)I think it is an attempt at sensationalism, but ironically I also think it's actually right. These guys expect to have to shoot unresponsive aircraft down, the very fact jets were scrambled means they were considering it. Attempts at direct contact are part of the procedure before you actually do so. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 14:32, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Cannot be 100% but from what I know it is also standard procedure for US jets to go only standby. Which means they literally power up all weapons to assume that the situation is dangerous. So I would think the information is relevant. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 07:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops...this was the title...so forget I said that :) DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 07:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)