Talk:Main belt asteroid No. 274301 named 'Wikipedia'

Review of revision 1792638 [Not ready]
The thing is that the Minor Planet Circulars are now published with a lag. So the information about the naming became available only yesterday (January 30) in the evening. You can see that the lists were updated on Jan 30: --Amakuha (talk) 14:57, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Minor Planet Names: Alphabetical List
 * Discovery Circumstances: Numbered Minor Planets (270001)-(275000)


 * So the circular is dated the 27th but actually became available on the 30th? That would be a valid reason for reckoning freshness from the 30th.  It should be made clear in the article.  --Pi zero (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Already circulating
This link's already going around the Twittersphere, a cleaned-up version with detail ASAP would be a good thing - chance to be the breaking news source. Commentary from WMF? - David Gerard (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'd heard something (via IRC) about the link being spread around.  It's clearly labeled as not having passed review, so readers are not uninformed thereof.  I'm working on it; I can't work faster than as fast as I can, which is how fast I work anyway.  --Pi zero (talk) 18:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * But of course :-) - David Gerard (talk) 20:33, 31 January 2013 (UTC)