Talk:Microsoft backtracks on Vista delay accusations

Hope the article is O.K. I had some doubts about the basic layout of the page, and would be extremely thankful of anyone willing to clean it up. Thanks CycloneNim 18:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The article is a little confusing. Yes, there are certain issues the EU currently have with MS, and some of these may apply in the new version.  The article needs to lay that information out in a much clearer manner. --Brian McNeil / talk 19:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
 * It needs also to me submitted at a spelling checker... sorry mine is in French but I've noticed a strange spelling for the word schedule. 82.224.88.52 21:40, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

The article concludes with "Only time will tell whether Microsoft decides to fight the commissions regulations or if it will comply and change its system." This contradicts the rest of the article, which begins with a quote by general counsel Brad Smith: "we have made changes to ensure that we're in compliance with our competition law obligations." (Do you mean to say "only time will tell whether Brad is lying"?) --67.10.163.122 21:55, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the first comment, sorry I will correct any spellings that are incorrect! As for the second, that is what I meant to say, however I was trying to bring it across in a more professional, less harmful way that "Brad is lying". I'll try and get this done now. CycloneNim 18:32, 18 October 2006 (UTC)