Talk:Mitt Romney wins Iowa Caucus by eight votes over surging Rick Santorum

Recount
This isn't a suitable subject for a correction, because we did not make any mistake in reporting.

I suggest an update reference to our later article that mentioned the fact that a recount indicated a different result. I'll try that, to see how it looks. --Pi zero (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I've proposed something; it's placed where one would put update, and does not add the page to Category:Corrected articles (which I maintain this does not belong in since we made no error), but does use correction for its attention-getting red color. --Pi zero (talk) 19:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * On further consideration, I think my addition is in itself not controversial &mdash; we might want to do more, but I don't see anyone objecting strenuously to at least that much &mdash; so (given its mild pseudo-content is a subset of such previously proposed) I've self-sighted it. --Pi zero (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Also: If folks think the note would work better at the top of the page, I would not object to that (since it calls itself a "Note" rather than a "Correction", and does not categorize the article). --Pi zero (talk) 19:55, 22 January 2012 (UTC)