Talk:Natural death confirmed for man who died on Disney World roller coaster

Two whole stories on this? --SVTCobra 17:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * One saying the guy is dead, one saying that it wasn't Disney fault. Google News has 388 follow-up stories.


 * a.) We need volume. b.) It would be unethical to not let people know that the accused (Disney) was mostly innocent (despite the lack of defibrillators), and c.) the original story was featured as the second lead, so obviously people thought that the first was important enough to highlight, so thus the second at least deserves to exist; interest doesn't dissipate that quick. --  Zanimum 18:11, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I am all for volume ... I was just surprised. Cheers, --SVTCobra 18:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Indeed?
This syntax is highly unnatural sounding. "Disney roller coaster death natural" is fine. Novaterata 18:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed, you are right. --SVTCobra 20:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)