Talk:New York City disputes 2010 Census

Review of revision 1203855 [Failed]

 * Um, isn't it better to just fix minor mistakes like this yourself than fail the entire article? This is part of the reason review times are so long - unnecessary fails. Tempodivalse [talk]  23:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, this is my first article. I didn't mean for it to fail immediately. Phearson (talk) 23:44, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You've got nothing to be sorry for; for a first article, this is an unusually good one at first glance. C628 (talk) 23:46, 28 March 2011 (UTC)