Talk:New York Times to start charging for access to web news

SIX sources?
Why does such a short article require six sources? --Brian McNeil / talk 16:56, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * More than necessary doesn't hurt. Plus, it's kind of interesting to see other companies' spin on the issue. --SweetNightmares (talk) 22:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It does hurt. The policy is WN:CS - which also goes on to explain the issue. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 22:28, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


 * This is the version I requested for publication:http://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=New_York_Times_to_start_charging_for_access_to_web_news&oldid=1196793 I don't know where the others came from, but they are not necessary for sourcing, IMO. I will remove them. Mattisse (talk) 23:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you. People forget this isn't Wikipedia, and the whole point isn't to act as a link agregator. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:16, 19 March 2011 (UTC)