Talk:New video shows 9/11 hijackers attending Al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan

Terrorist
One...it is a terrorist camp per sources. The word terrorist can be sourced in all sources. In this case Terrorist is NOT used as a POV but used as a fact to describe these 2 terrorists. Jason Safoutin 21:27, 2 October 2006 (UTC) . So you see, even though you and your fellow Americans may consider Al-Qaeda "terrorists", to many other people the mujahideen of the Al-Qaeda are warriors fighting for a noble cause. Hence, we will not use the word "terrorist". PVJ(Talk)(Articles I have written) 02:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the late reply Jason, but I had other issues to focus on. As for the word "terrorist", Wiktionary itself clarifies that "he use of the label "terrorist" is often controversial or subjective, since one person's terrorist may be another's freedom fighter, and vice versa."
 * Then tell me what were the highjackers and where did they train? Are they lovable bunnies who trained at Disney Land? I am sorry but these were terrorists at a terror camp. The camp is NOT necessairly Al-Qaeda and therefore IMO is misleading. Jason Safoutin 20:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * To you, they were "terrorists", to others they were matyrs. "Terrorist" is not NPOV. PVJ(Talk)(Articles I have written) [[Image:Flag_of_India.svg|25px]] 01:15, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Imo religion is a POV...thus until you can provide a reason as to why they are not terrorists and a SOURCE that says they are not then I will be happy. But the reason you do not want the word is coz of a "Belief" which ois not a FACT and is a POV. Provide proof that they are matyrs. Jason Safoutin 17:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Spelling
"Highjackers" should be "Hijackers". --wikitravel:User:Evan


 * Done. F  e  llow  Wiki  News   (W)  20:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Please add this article to Category:9/11. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Jcart1534 05:56, 29 December 2007 (UTC)