Talk:Pakistani Taliban threaten revenge attack after bin Laden death; CIA says retaliation is likely

Merge
There seems to be an awful lot of overlap between this and the existing article; why do we need another? — μchip08 14:40, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

I could not disagree more. These are two entirely separate stories. One announces the death of the world's most wanted man, the second announces the proclaimed intentions of an international terrorist organization. Whereas it's true that they are making these threats ostensibly because of bin Laden's death, the fact is, these are the same people who make the same threats over cartoons, and book burnings, and anything else they disagree with. These are separate stories, and should be treated as such, especially since they will likely develop separately. Tadpole256 (talk) 14:46, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * given that this has now blossomed into multiple warnings from U.S. officials and analysts and a threat from the Pakistani Taliban. While the story about Osama and this are linked, they are still very separate.  wacky wace  18:35, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Plus, the death is getting a little long in the tooth to be honest... this warrants enough for it to be a separate article. --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1225638 [Failed]

 * The article in the "related" section above the sources.  wacky wace  22:47, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Which source exactly? I'm not in the mood to search through 40 sources to find the quote? --Patrick M (TUFKAAP) (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Added the source to the source section.  wacky wace  06:28, 3 May 2011 (UTC)