Talk:Pakistani army seizes Taliban stronghold after week-long battle

Should have failed review
This should have failed review, or been worked over somewhat prior to publication. It has POV issues, spelling errors, improperly cited sources, and quite a few other issues. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:00, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * There was one slight POV issue that I missed, which i now toned down. But I don't see any spelling errors. or any of the other issues you described? Maybe i'm missing something. Tempodivalse [talk]  00:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Forgive me if I'm out of touch, but aren't edits like these supposed to happen before the publish? -  Amgine | t 00:11, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, as should this edit. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:15, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And this one - although the categories are not that critical. --Brian McNeil / talk 00:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I completely forgot about the categories - I always forget to check them when reviewing. The other issues I didn't notice until after reviewing the article, my bad. (Self-note: don't review articles when you're tired.) Tempodivalse [talk]  00:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I personally apologize for the mistakes, I have not been in the best of conditions lately. I will take much better care in reviewing my writing before asking for a review. Marx01  Tell me about it 00:46, 26 October 2009 (UTC)