Talk:President Obama renews his push to close Guantanamo detention facility

Comments
Right off hand, I see purple prose in the lede, and an external link in the body. The author should know by now not to do these things, which mean more work for some reviewer to correct them. --Pi zero (talk) 23:37, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Things to work on before hitting review me please
Hi. I moved More US medical staff enter Guantanamo Bay back to draft. There are some fundamental point of view problems that need to be addressed, some key facts missing (Can I assume it is the New Zealand navy that sent extra troops) no categories, no sidebar, no pictures, external links embedded in the article. Before submitting for review again, please address them so you do not get a not ready for publication, which will further delay potential publication. --LauraHale (talk) 23:39, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1889518 [Not ready]

 * Source from the United Arab Emirates
 * Source from India

I think one of the problems here is that the sources talking about this situation are themselves not fundamentally neutral and have their own point of views to a degree that they are advancing. Thus, getting to the core facts that can be reported on in a neutral fashion is hard. --LauraHale (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2013 (UTC)


 * this source is probably one of the better ones in terms of the lead being close to what Wikinews would want as a potential model. --LauraHale (talk) 02:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC)