Talk:Row over Australian flag at Bondi Pavilion

Title a little bit misleading
I dont think the flag has been banned at Bondi. The title should be changed - 202.173.128.90 20:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC) (didnt log in - Cartman02au 10:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC))
 * I think I agree. Simeons recent changes to the article have improved it greatly, but the title still needs work. The word "banned" is very misleading. How about "Australian flag will not be flown over Bondi pavilion"? - Borofkin 02:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I like the new title. The problem with the word "banned", by the way, is that there is not agreement that anything resembling a ban has actually occured. Specifically, Waverley council, who is at the centre of the dispute, completely reject the suggestion that it has been banned. I like the new title, it more accurately reflects the content of the article. - Borofkin 04:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The new title is great, explains it perfectly - Cartman02au 10:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Fixed Title

 * I've changed the heading. A brand new title to appease the revoltiong masses! : :) Happy Gnu Yr --elliot_k 05:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the clarity edits, by the way.--elliot_k 06:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The new heading is much better. The impression I got before was that the council for Bondi were banning Aussie flags all over or burning them LOL - Cartman02au 10:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Flag image
When the article is unlocked can someone change the image from the PNG to Image:Flag of Australia.svg. 202.180.83.6 00:53, 8 February 2006 (UTC) (Greentubing (en:WP talk)).
 * Done. - Borofkin 00:55, 8 February 2006 (UTC)