Talk:Russian passenger jet crashes on Indonesian demonstration flight

Review of revision 1494842 [Not ready]

 * Scooped. needs rewrite after wreckage found LeadSongDog (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, you scooped it? All by yourself? Forgive me for not believing you, especially when you had a BBC link to back you up and no OR notes. This is not a story with a great deal of scope for scooping anyone as, realistically, we have nobody in the area. Blood Red Sandman  (Talk)   (Contribs) 09:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * No of course I didn't scoop it, but it had been scooped. First local media did, then BBC and everyone else promulgated it. The point was that publishing a story saying that it's still missing when it has already been found would be just silly. LeadSongDog (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Competition
Rather than "Canada", should identify the competitive aircraft. Is the comparison the Bombardier CRJ-1000 or Bombardier CSeries? Should also consider the Embraer E-195 and Boeing 717 as direct competition. LeadSongDog (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The issue is source-checking. Everything has to be rigorously verified by an independent reviewer from cited trust-worthy sources, and the &lt;expletive&gt; sources were changed between when the article was written and now as I was reviewing it.  --Pi zero (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)