Talk:Same-sex spouse of Luxembourg's Prime Minister poses with other spouses of world leaders in Brussels photo op

Title
I want to change the title to "Husband of Luxembourg's Prime Minister poses with wives of world leaders in Brussels photo op". However, I'm hesitant for the suggested title might be POV. Or maybe I'm wrong. --George Ho (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think that's POV so much as it puts the focus specifically on the action performed by one person. I only read the article once but it felt to me that it was about the photo op itself, everyone together and the LGBT milestone aspect was almost an afterthought. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:12, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * In that case, may I change the title right away then? --George Ho (talk) 16:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hm. Terms husband and wife say something about the spouse but not the leader.  Does it really go without saying that all these leaders would be male?  --Pi zero (talk) 16:15, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hmm.... (again). I guess we'll stick with the current title as is for now until using the suggested title is verified as all right to use. --George Ho (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ...I don't know who would conclude that leaders are "females", but I think... not one? --George Ho (talk) 18:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Heh. Well, when I first glanced unprimed at this discussion, something about spouses of leaders being one husband and a bunch of wives, the first guess that occurred to me was that one of the leaders was a woman.  --Pi zero (talk) 01:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Does that make me less progressive-minded... or more? --Pi zero (talk) 01:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * My impression is that the relevance of the article is the same-sex-spouse aspect. --Pi zero (talk) 02:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)