Talk:Sandra Fluke insists she will not be silenced

OR notes
As can be seen, this article is sourced entirely to primary sources, thus the Original reporting tag.

A summary of some of the recent chronology can be found at wikisource:Author:Sandra Kay Fluke and at Sandra Fluke. :) -- Cirt (talk) 01:16, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Response to review by Pi zero
-- Cirt (talk) 05:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) See below sect, Examples of similar news articles from other secondary sources. I've listed multiple other secondary sources that have covered this subject as well. It's newsworthy, noteworthy, educational, and topical. Other secondary news sources including ', the ', and the , obviously think this is newsworthy enough to cover. We should too. :)
 * 2) If you have any specific recommendations regarding ways to alter the article stylistically in order to fix "a moderately superficial problem of presentation", please, suggest them! I'd be more than happy to look over specific advice and input about that. However, I did take care to painstakingly do my best to take into account advice from from prior article reviews where issues were successfully addressed &mdash; and start right out with the most topical recent material, and proceed downwards chronologically with background material. This style was satisfactory by  in subsequent reviews.
 * 3) I think you'll find that locating the facts, to be verified, is not challenging. Each section of the article is pretty clear chronologically and as to background. The bulk of the material is sourced to the primary sources pertaining to each section. For example, the speech by the President of the United States, is sourced to his speech, at The White House, which is helpfully linked to, I might add, in the video, directly next to the article text. I've also gone ahead and added a few secondary sources to help with ease of reference confirmation, diff.

Examples of similar news articles from other secondary sources
Examples of similar news articles from other secondary sources: -- Cirt (talk) 05:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1435442 [Passed]

 * Thank you. -- Cirt (talk) 18:31, 14 March 2012 (UTC)