Talk:Scientists report chemotherapy cocktail may cause adult women to grow new egg cells

Review of revision 4268150 [Not ready]
(Btw, it's now quite late where I am, so I won't be doing any more review for, at best, most of the next half day. It's not impossible another reviewer might come by sooner.  --Pi zero (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC))
 * Soooooo greenlight to work on this or wait for more? Darkfrog24 (talk) 04:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Green light, absolutely; time is at a premium here, as, in stark contrast to Wikipedia, here there definitely is a deadline. The ball is in your court, to revise and resubmit for consideration of whatever reviewer chooses to take it up (probably me, tomorrow, but not necessarily).  --Pi zero (talk) 04:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Okay, gave it a scrub and rearrange. I like the funnel opening, though. Darkfrog24 (talk) 14:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * When you believe it's ready to be re-reviewed, submit it; there should be a button on the not-ready tag at the top of the page. --Pi zero (talk) 14:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Headline spelling
Small typo in "scientists", ; I can't rename in my account. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Zanimum (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * It's almost always undesirable to rename after publication, and a few months back we had some page-move vandalism, so now I usually fully protect moves on published articles. A typo like this is a pretty obvious exception to the rule.  Fixed; thanks.  --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)