Talk:Senator David Vitter to earmark $100,000 for creationist group

POV
Firstly, is this really an important story?

Secondly, if you can't see the bias in this you really need to get your head examined.

I suggest we just delete this.

--206.116.168.12 08:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
 * What is missing is the Senator's side of the story. Did he make any statement to go with the earmarking of these funds or was it just a line item in a budget? --Brian McNeil / talk 09:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * 206.116.168.12, many blogs are writing about this as well as many science groups. If its bias against creationism, that's because science is consider creationism pseudoscience. Part of Vitter's statement. Shown2233361 15:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * A senator giving tax payer money to a group who pushes a religious agenda on public schools is noteworthy. That is, afterall, why there is press coverage/sources on this page. What is exactly is the "bias" you dispute? C56C 16:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I'd say that putting the word "combat" in quotes is showing a bias. Wikisoup 19:27, 3 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Its the word used on LFF's website, which is why its in quotes. C56C 20:16, 3 October 2007 (UTC)