Talk:Transcript of 9/11 confession by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed released

title change
I'm changing the title because I think this is a standard case of an "alleged" and "supposedly" report.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

I admit "Transcript of 9/11 confession by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed released" is not the perfect title. I think it should change once we agree on a NPOV title that is more informative. I have a problems with "9/11 mastermind admits to beheading Daniel Pearl", because it contains two unverified facts, namely first that he is the mastermind and second that he really confessed all those things written in the transcript.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * What about "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed transcript suggests he beheaded journalist Daniel Pearl"? --  Zanimum 18:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * That would be fine by me. I can't quite understand however why there is such a focus on Pearl and not on the other elements from the transcript. But it's ok to me.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:06, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * To be honest, I haven't read the article... --  Zanimum 19:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

POV avoiding
Lets try and not get into a war about how the confession was attained. Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 18:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Cats
Don't we have a 9/11 category?--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 19:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * We have an al-Queda category, I believe.  Thunderhead  ►  19:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

third person
is this correct at the end of the quote it says "It is my opinion the detainee is in a lose-lose situation". when i read this it makes it sound like he is talking about himself in the thord person. is this correct or is it someone else saying this--86.136.226.58 19:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Please add this article to Category:9/11. Blood Red Sandman (Talk)   (Contribs) 15:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * ✅ Adambro 15:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)