Talk:U.S. Congress confirms electoral college vote for Trump presidency

I have embedded notes regarding which source supplied which facts in the source code. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:11, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

...and to get downright technical:
This is the phrase that caused me to glitch: 'This is a common slogan among Americans who believe that the electoral college system should be replaced.' --Bddpaux (talk) 16:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I'll see if I can run down something more explicit, but in the meantime, out it comes. Darkfrog24 (talk) 16:50, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I admit I'm worried about this article. Bddpaux, with all the stuff that goes on in xyr life, might well not have time to get back to this today; I'm having trouble getting in reviews myself atm and might well not get to it today; and it's at the outer end of the range for possible freshness. :-S  --Pi zero (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4277600 [Passed]

 * I didn't want to complain while it was still under review, but the last time I wrote an article about the U.S. electoral college I got a comment to make sure I explained a bit about it in the future. International audiences and all that.
 * In your opinion, did the in-Wikicode notes about which source supplied which fact help the review process or did it just get in the way? I share Pi zero's concerns about freshness (and about people having real lives and other hobbies that prevent them from being constantly on the spot) and I'd like to do what I can to speed up the process. Darkfrog24 (talk) 22:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)